Women are from Mars, Men are from a Corrupt Washington
The Obama’s campaign slogan and apparently his entire plan to fix the free world is summed up in one word CHANGE! Nobody is quite sure on what that change will be but we all know that his change will be beneficial to the country, at least that’s what he is telling us. I have yet to see him buck the current order in Washington. His biggest change to me will be an increase in taxes that historically have not done anything to help ease the economy.
One campaign has actually wanted to change that order in Washington. McCain has, of course, picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. This will break up the good ol’ boys network that has currently plagued our nation’s capitol. Change is coming but it’s only coming from one direction, McCain.
Where are all the women’s groups that were so vocal for Hilary Clinton? Well those same women’s groups obviously have a political agenda and don’t just want a woman in the White House. They want a woman in the white house that agrees with them on every issue. If you look on the Women Against Palin website one of their reasons why Palin does not champion women’s rights is because, “Palin does not believe that humans contribute to global warming and she wants to take the polar bear off of the endangered species list so she can drill for oil in Alaska.” If that does not scream to you as a political agenda then I don’t know what does. That phrase has nothing to do with women yet it is included as one of the main reasons why she is anti-woman. It seems to me that women’s groups only support a candidate when it is convenient to them. Instead they decide to attack the one woman who could actually make it to the White House as an anti-feminist “pig”.
Women across the country are overwhelmingly giving one reason why Palin can't be part of the White House family, because she has one of her own. How is Sarah Palin supposed to take care of her kids if she is running the country? Well last time I checked she had a husband who seemed more than capable of raising the kids. People seem to skip over the stay-at-home dad aspect of their relationship. She ran a state, for crying out loud, with 5 kids. Feminist groups wanted women in the workplace and more dads at home. This could turn out to the staple family for them but again because “she hates the polar bears” she must not be a real woman and actually want their demise. That logic is absurd.
I was watching Fox News the other day and they were interviewing women on how they think Sarah Palin would be as a VP. One actually said that how can she run the country when she is supposed to be the head of the household, a chef and a chauffeur. It seems to me that the older women are stuck in past and are shocked to see that one of them can make it this far. Of course they are proud of what Palin has done but they were raised with a very chauvinistic society and have yet to break that.
The young voter was raised in a very open and equal society, of course not as equal as we would like but more so than in the past. Talking to a few of my friends, who happen to be women, most of them said that they didn’t care about her daughter being pregnant and how her kids are going to get to soccer practice. All they cared about were the issues that would affect them. Again this block of voters is being ignored in the election. People are wasting their breath when they try to smear Palin as an anti-woman with their sexist remarks. It’s just going to bounce off the young voter because they can bypass the lies and faulty logic and make up their minds according to an equal society. One way to confuse a liberal, use logic and facts.
One campaign has actually wanted to change that order in Washington. McCain has, of course, picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. This will break up the good ol’ boys network that has currently plagued our nation’s capitol. Change is coming but it’s only coming from one direction, McCain.
Where are all the women’s groups that were so vocal for Hilary Clinton? Well those same women’s groups obviously have a political agenda and don’t just want a woman in the White House. They want a woman in the white house that agrees with them on every issue. If you look on the Women Against Palin website one of their reasons why Palin does not champion women’s rights is because, “Palin does not believe that humans contribute to global warming and she wants to take the polar bear off of the endangered species list so she can drill for oil in Alaska.” If that does not scream to you as a political agenda then I don’t know what does. That phrase has nothing to do with women yet it is included as one of the main reasons why she is anti-woman. It seems to me that women’s groups only support a candidate when it is convenient to them. Instead they decide to attack the one woman who could actually make it to the White House as an anti-feminist “pig”.
Women across the country are overwhelmingly giving one reason why Palin can't be part of the White House family, because she has one of her own. How is Sarah Palin supposed to take care of her kids if she is running the country? Well last time I checked she had a husband who seemed more than capable of raising the kids. People seem to skip over the stay-at-home dad aspect of their relationship. She ran a state, for crying out loud, with 5 kids. Feminist groups wanted women in the workplace and more dads at home. This could turn out to the staple family for them but again because “she hates the polar bears” she must not be a real woman and actually want their demise. That logic is absurd.
I was watching Fox News the other day and they were interviewing women on how they think Sarah Palin would be as a VP. One actually said that how can she run the country when she is supposed to be the head of the household, a chef and a chauffeur. It seems to me that the older women are stuck in past and are shocked to see that one of them can make it this far. Of course they are proud of what Palin has done but they were raised with a very chauvinistic society and have yet to break that.
The young voter was raised in a very open and equal society, of course not as equal as we would like but more so than in the past. Talking to a few of my friends, who happen to be women, most of them said that they didn’t care about her daughter being pregnant and how her kids are going to get to soccer practice. All they cared about were the issues that would affect them. Again this block of voters is being ignored in the election. People are wasting their breath when they try to smear Palin as an anti-woman with their sexist remarks. It’s just going to bounce off the young voter because they can bypass the lies and faulty logic and make up their minds according to an equal society. One way to confuse a liberal, use logic and facts.
Either way our country is going to change, having a woman vice-president seems to be the way to go. I think your points are very strong. I think we should leave subject matters that are un-related to the political side out of the election out of it.
Reply to this
This is right on Ryan. We need new blood in Washington, the status quo will get us nothing than what we have today. If you just wake up and do the same thing we have always done, we will alway get what we have now. This is not just about change, but someone inspired that has the guts to make the change.
Reply to this
Before it's too late, I hope Obama will eventually be exposed for how corrupt he really is especially with his excessive campaign contributions from both Fannie and Freddie which are in the center of the Democratic created mortgage/credit crisis.
Reply to this
ONCE UPON A TIME
Once upon a time , there was a young charismatic and eloquent
young leader who decided his nation need a change and that he was the
one to implement it.
.
The people were receptive and ready for a change.
..
He spoke passionately when denouncing the existing system, and the
media loved him.
.
Nobody questioned what he believed in or whom his friends were. He
would help the poor and bring free medical care and education to all.
He would bring justice and equality.
.
He said: I am for hope and change and I will bring you both. Nobody
bothered to ask about the change, so by the time the executioners guns
went silent, all personal firearms had been confiscated.
When everyone was finally equal, they were equally poor, hungry and
miserable.
.
Their free education was worthless.
When the change fully implemented, the country had been reduced to a
Third World status. More than a million people fled in small boats
and rafts.
.
The charismatic young leader was Fidel Castro; the nation, Cuba
.
The citizens of the United States would never fall for a charismatic,
eloquent young leader who promises hope and change without asking, "What
change, and how much will it cost us?"
...
. . . would we?
Reply to this